ASSESSMENT OF MALASSEZIA SP IN CASES OF CANINE CHRONIC BACTERIAL OTITIS EXTERNA

Type:
Free Communication
Topic:
Dermatology
Companies:
(1) UBL University, Oniris, DPM Unit, Nantes, France
(2) UBL University, Oniris, NP3 Unit, Nantes, France
(3) UBL Univerity, Oniris, Nantes, France
Authors:
Thomas Brément (1)
Margaux Rivalain (3)
Dorian Guillemaille (1)
Carmen Giménez Acosta (1)
Cécile Roux (1)
Patrick Bourdeau (1,2)
Vincent Bruet (1,2)
Paper:
RESUMEN CORTO - SHORT SUMMARY

Little information is available on the association and cytological features between bacteria and Malassezia sp in case of canine otitis externa (OE). The aim of this study is to better characterize the association of Malassezia overgrowth in cases of Chronic Otitis Externa (COE) including a bacterial component, either bacterial overgrowth or infection, in dogs (clinical evolution for more than two weeks, bacteria seen on cytology).

Data from 104 ears (64 dogs) with bacterial COE including bacterial identification, OTIS-3 and results of cytology (microbial features and type of associated inflammatory reaction) were analyzed. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was performed for statistical analysis.

Malassezia sp were present in 57/104 ears (55%), associated with cocci (17, 30%), mixed population of bacteria (cocci and rods) (37, 65%) and rods (3, 5%). Malassezia were more frequently associated with cocci (p-value = 0,02).

Malassezia sp were positively associated with Staphylococcus sp (39, 70%) but negatively with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12, 21%) and Streptococcus sp (9, 16%) (p-value = 0,01). Corynebacterium sp and Proteus mirabilis had no influence on Malassezia population in ears.

There was no correlation of OTIS-3 scores and Malassezia population.

Malassezia were associated with bacterial overgrowth (BOG : bacteria adherent to corneocytes) in 46% of cases (26/57), with purulent reaction (neutrophils) in 54% (31/57) and never with pyogranulomatous reaction (PGR : neutrophils + macrophages). There was a negative correlation between Malassezia and PGR (p-value = 0,02). Suppuration was associated with a low number of Malassezia (< 5 Malassezia per HPF) on cytology (26/31 : 84%), compared with BOG (11/26 : 42%) (p-value=8,47.10-10).



BIBLIOGRAFÍA

[1] Bensignor E, Forsythe PJ. An approach to otitis externa. En : BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Dermatology. 3rd edn. Eds R. Marsella, H. A. Jackson, 2012 ; 110-120

[2] Brément T, Bourdeau P, Bruet V : Les otites externes canines : critères de choix d’un traitement auriculaire. Le Point Vétérinaire 2017 ; 381 : 14-19

[3] Chickering WR : Cytologic evaluation of otic exudates. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1988;18(4):773-782

[4] Angus JC : Otic cytology in health and disease. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2004 ; 34(2):411-424

[5] Harvey RG, Harari J, Delauche AJ. Diagnostic procedures. En: Ear diseases of the dog and cat. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 2001 ; 43-80.

[6] Bourdeau P : Comparison of cytology and fungal culture for the evaluation of populations of Malassezia pachydermatis in ear canal of dogs. Proceedings North Am. Vet. Dermatol. Forum, Palm- Springs, USA. 2006:179.

[7] Cafarchia C, Gallo S, Capelli G, Otranto D : Occurrence and population size of Malassezia spp. in the external ear canal of dogs and cats both healthy and with otitis. Mycopathologia 2005 ; 160: 143–149